

"Let's be clear about one thing. The plane which hit the south tower was not and could not possibly have been flight 175 piloted by Arab Islamist extremist terrorists. That's established fact, based on first hand, recorded in real time, physical reality. The plane that hit the south tower was not flight 175". - This was a quote taken off of the Loose Change Forum.
Referring to the plane scale up on the left- The nose section of a 200 series, A, is shorter than the wing assembly, B. Whereas for the 300 series A is longer than B. 767-200 => A:B = 190:200 = 0.95:1, i.e. A is less than B767-300 => A:B = 221:200 = 1.105:1, i.e. A is greater than BWhile the NIST frames give us A:B = 20.76:19.91 = 1.04:1(remember that these are Lower Limit Values, see Techie Notes), in other words, A is greater than B Therefore: This plane's fuselage is too long to be a Boeing 767-200. Ergo: The plane that hit the South Tower was not N612UA. It was not Flight 175!
It also states that there was no way that Arabs flew the planes into the towers. These are quotes taken from some instructors:
Mohammed Atta: "His attention span was zero."
Khalid Al-Mihdhar: "We didn't kick him out, but he didn't live up to our standards." Marwan Al-Shehhi: “He was dropped because of his limited English and incompetence at the controls.” Salem Al-Hazmi: "We advised him to quit after two lessons.”
Hani Hanjour: "His English was horrible, and his mechanical skills were even worse. It was like he had hardly even ever driven a car. I’m still to this day amazed that he could have flown into the Pentagon. He could not fly at all.”
There is much evidence to support that it was not possible that flight 175 flew into the South Tower on 9/11. It is also pretty remarkable if Arabs could have flown the planes into the towers.
The culprit that the loosechange forum depicts is a Boeing 767 tanker.
Here is how they describe it:
- The Boeing 767 tanker transport aircraft, designated KC-767 for the US Air Force, is a high performance version of the Boeing 767-200ER twin aisle jetliner equipped for fully integrated tanker operations. It is fitted with either boom and receptacle refuelling, hose and drogue refuelling or both. The commercial 767 first entered service in 1982 and more than 880 aircraft have been delivered. The cabin of the tanker can be configured for passenger transport, as a freighter, convertible (passenger or freighter) or Combi (passenger and freighter).
- DESIGN- The structure incorporates new materials such as improved aluminium alloys, graphite composites and hybrid Kevlar graphite composites, which give enhanced strength, durability and longevity.
- The configuration of a commercial 767 for the tanker transport role involves the installation of additional pumps and auxiliary fuel tanks together with the fuel distribution lines below the floor of the main cabin, leaving the main cabin free for cargo, passenger or both cargo and passenger transportation. The concept allows simultaneous refuelling and airlift operations or successive refuelling and airlift missions.
- In the cargo configuration, the aircraft can transport 19 standard military 463-L pallets; in the passenger configuration, 200 passengers can be accommodated; and in the Combi configuration ten cargo pallets and 100 passengers can be carried.
- COCKPIT- The 767 Tanker Transport aircraft has an advanced two person all-digital flight deck.
This is all the information I needed to come to the conclusion that 9/11 was not a terrorist act.
All of the information on this blog was taken from: <http://s15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=9781For more information and pictures, go to this website.
No comments:
Post a Comment